Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Transplantation ; 106(9):S365-S365, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2237245
2.
Cell ; 185(3):493-+, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1757189

RESUMEN

Severe COVID-19 is linked to both dysfunctional immune response and unrestrained immunopathology, and it remains unclear whether T cells contribute to disease pathology. Here, we combined single-cell transcriptomics and single-cell proteomics with mechanistic studies to assess pathogenic T cell functions and inducing signals. We identified highly activated CD16(+) T cells with increased cytotoxic functions in severe COVID-19. CD16 expression enabled immune-complex-mediated, T cell receptor-independent degranulation and cytotoxicity not found in other diseases. CD16(+) T cells from COVID-19 patients promoted microvascular endothelial cell injury and release of neutrophil and monocyte chemoattractants. CD16(+) T cell clones persisted beyond acute disease maintaining their cytotoxic phenotype. Increased generation of C3a in severe COVID-19 induced activated CD16(+) cytotoxic T cells. Proportions of activated CD16(+) T cells and plasma levels of complement proteins upstream of C3a were associated with fatal outcome of COVID-19, supporting a pathological role of exacerbated cytotoxicity and complement activation in COVID-19.

3.
Digestive and Liver Disease ; 54:S14, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1734330

RESUMEN

Background and aims: Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) have been considered as an extremely vulnerable population in respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We aimed to assess the incidence and lethality rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in different organ transplant settings using the liver as a comparator. Methods: In this nationwide population-based study we compared the crude incidence and lethality rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection [95% Bonferroni adjusted CI (Ba-CI)] among Italian LTRs as compared to non-liver SOTRs and to general population. The following independent groups had been compared: Italian general population, all SOTRs, liver transplant recipients (LTRs) and non-Liver SOTRs in area with different incidence of infection. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) and lethality rate ratio (LRR) was assessed. Community risk exposures in transplant settings were assessed. Results: From February 21 to June 22, 2020, there were 450 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infections over 14168 LTRs (n=89) and 29815 non-liver SOTRs (n= 361). A significantly lower risk of infection [IRR 0.56 (Ba-CI 0.34-0.92), 0.45 (Ba-CI 0.26-0.79), 0.52 (Ba-CI 0.36-0.75)] and a lower lethality rate ratio [(LRR 0.61 (Ba-CI 0.23-1.57), 0.37 (0.08-1.76), 0.52 (0.23-1.18] was found among LTRs as compared to non-liver SOTRs in the three areas. Excluding Lombardy, the risk of infection and lethality in LTRs was lower compared to general population. Non-Liver SOTRs showed an increased risk of infection and lethality at all geographic levels compared to general population. No significant difference in the adherence to mitigation policies was found. Conclusions: Liver transplantation was associated with a significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and lethality in respect to non-liver solid organ transplants. A separate evaluation of organ-specific risk stratification analysis and vaccination responses in transplant population is needed.

4.
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research ; 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1402260

RESUMEN

This research examines how COVID-19 influences consumer responses to product offerings identified as being available “near me” versus “not near me.” We theorize that the heightened sense of isolation, or loneliness, brought on by COVID-19 evokes a need for social connection that increases the attractiveness of “not near” offerings, thereby eliminating the preference advantage otherwise expected for “near me” offerings. Providing support for the theorized process, this increased preference for “not near” offerings observed when COVID-19 concerns are (vs. are not) salient is attenuated among individuals who chronically experience loneliness and among those who feel strongly connected to others. These findings offer new insights into consumer decision making during pandemics like COVID-19. The results also carry important policy implications regarding the potentially unintended consequences associated with social distancing measures—namely, making consumers more geographically mobile in shopping for products. © 2021 Association for Consumer Research. All rights reserved.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA